The 2014 Shadow Giller Prize winner is…

by

11shadow logo

2014 michaels

…Sean Michaels, for Us Conductors.

Before offering some thoughts on the (surprise) winner, allow me to digress briefly on this year’s deliberations. Alison Gzowski, a Shadow Jury veteran of more than 10 years, prefaced her original vote submission with the following: “I have to say this was the toughest Shadow Giller yet. There is no standout, I have not been impressed by the list and not sure of my opinion as reading one book hit close to home.” I think the other three of us would agree with that sentiment: this year’s list was characterized by good (perhaps even very good) but not great books, all of which had their flaws as well as strengths. And given that there was no obvious standout (as The Orenda was last year), the way that finalist books hit a particular personal chord (or prejudice) influenced every juror.

In fact, after two rounds of voting, we came down to a virtual tie between Us Conductors and Frances Itani’s Tell — Kimbofo’s enthusiastic support for Sean Michaels’ book and the fact that it is his debut were enough to lead me as chair to suggest we give it the nod.

Us Conductors is a fictionalized biography of the Russian engineer and physicist Lev Termen, inventor of (among many other things) the theremin, which is sort of a precursor of the Moog synthesizer. The first section of the book takes place in upscale New York — Termen is promoting his instrument from a suite at the Plaza, with concerts at Carnegie Hall. Things start to go downhill (more from hopeless financial mismanagement than anything else) and the naïve scientist slips into a role as a spy. That leads to section two of the novel: Termen’s spell in the gulag, since his spying career was hardly stellar and he is a convenient scapegoat. And finally, section three takes place in Moscow — he is still a prisoner, but now he is back to being an inventing scientist as well.

You can read Kimbofo’s recently posted review in full here — this is how she concludes it:

At times [Lev] seems alarmingly trusting — for instance, he leaves all his business decisions to a man he knows little about and then seems unfazed when he’s barely got a dime to rub together. But just when you have Leon pegged as being a passive character, he does something completely left of field (I can’t reveal it here, because it’s a bit of a plot spoiler) and you realise you should never under-estimate him.

This is what makes Us Conductors such an intriguing read. But it’s also an intriguing read because it’s so ambitious in scope and theme. It’s a story about music, invention, emigration, science, love, espionage, money, fame, crime and punishment. It’s part New York novel, part prison memoir, part espionage tale, part romance. But, most of all, it’s epic, life-affirming — and fun.

I’d say that is a fair summary of what the rest of us thought, perhaps a bit more enthusiastic. As Trevor said “it has its ups and downs” and I concluded my review of it last spring (you can find the full version here) with:

I’d like to quote Michaels’ “Author’s Note and Acknowledgements” as an indication of the spirit of the novel. While it is based on known facts about Termen’s life, “it is full of distortions, elisions, omission, and lies”. In the real life, the author saw the elements of a good story — and at least in the first half, he certainly delivered on it.

As usual, the Shadow Giller Jury wishes to be totally transparent in how it reached its conclusions. As chair, I followed the same approach that we had used in the past three years, giving each juror 100 points to spread among the six shortlist titles. Here is what that produced:

Kim: Michaels 38, Itani 26, Bezmozgis 11, O’Neill 10, Toews 9, Viswanathan 5
Alison: Bezmozgis 32, Toews 32, Michaels 15, Itani 11, O’Neill 5, Viswanathan 5
Trevor: Itani 24, Bezmozgis 20, O’Neill 18, Michaels 17, Toews 16, Viswanathan 5
Kevin: Itani 28, Michaels 26, Bezmozgis 19, O’Neill 13, Viswanathan 9, Toews 5

Total: Michaels 96, Itani 89, Bezmozgis 82, Toews 62, O’Neill 46, Viswanathan 24

As you can see, we were spread all over in our opinions of the best book — O’Neill and Viswanathan had no support, but all the other four did.

(A brief aside on Miriam Toews All My Puny Sorrows. I have confessed to not liking it at all — it is a book about suicide with the central story being one sister’s struggle with how to help her sibling successfully kill herself when she has failed many times before. As is well known in the Canadian publishing community, it is a fictionalized account of the author’s own recent experiences. Toews is an engaging, popular person in that community and I suspect that has influenced the critical response. The book obviously succeeds for some people (see Alison’s total). For the other three of us — who are primarily readers rather than members of the literary community — it was far less impressive).

We headed into a second ballot — this time I asked that 100 points be spread between Michaels, Itani and Bezmozgis. Alas, Alison was on a board retreat and out of touch (for an organization founded by her father, the Peter Gzowski Invitational golf tournaments which raise more than $1 million a year for literary organizations in Canada — so she was very much present in spirit), so this one only had three jurors voting. The results:

Trevor: Itani 36, Michaels 32, Bezmozgis 32
Kim: Michaels 50, Itani 40, Bezmozgis 10
Kevin: Itani 40, Michaels 34, Bezmozgis 26

All three of us agreed that we would be happy with any of the three as a winner — I explained above how it came to be Michaels.

Given that even in that second ballot Itani’s Tell was the favorite of two of us, it hardly seems fair to end this year’s Shadow Jury deliberations without some acknowledgement of it. In my review, I called it a Canadian version of the “Irish village” novel — the story involves two couples, each with there own set of difficulties, in a small Ontario town in the aftermath of the Great War. Here is what Trevor had to say about it when he submitted his vote:

I was not anxious to read this book when I read about its plot. War novels are dime a dozen, and this year I received dozens of World War I books in the mail. There are masterpieces out there, but I unfortunately tend to refuse the books the benefit of the doubt. I was shocked at how much this book suited my desire for an introspective look at community. I loved the writing itself — slow, detailed, delicate — as it grew increasingly complex. And I’m a freak for small-towns!

As he notes, it has been a big year for Great War novels and for many readers (you can include me) that has produced some “war fiction fatigue”. Rest assured, Tell is a very good novel that is worth the read: you can find Kim’s review here and KfC’s here.

Our congratulations to Sean Michaels — Us Conductors was a most rewarding read for all of us. And now, the Shadow Jury will sit back and await the Real Jury’s decision. For what it is worth, we are not expecting them to agree with us — our prediction is that Miriam Toews will be picking up the $100,000 cheque tomorrow night. (The Globe and Mail this Saturday reported on a poll of 30 “industry” people and their predictions of the winner: Toews 19, Bezmozgis 4, Itani 3, O’Neill 2, Viswanathan 2, Michaels 0. Obviously, the Shadow Giller readers are out of touch with the industry consensus.)

Finally, I realize that my reading has run ahead of my reviewing and three of the shortlist (All My Puny Sorrows, The Girl Who Was Saturday Night and The Ever After of Ashwin Rao) have not yet been reviewed here. They should be up within the next two weeks.

9 Responses to “The 2014 Shadow Giller Prize winner is…”

  1. Sheila O'Brien Says:

    Congratulations to Sean Michaels. And thank you for the charming post about how you hard working Jurors reached a verdict.

    Like

  2. Janice Croissant Says:

    I have been very disappointed in the past few years with the Giller short list (and ultimate winner) and am puzzled by the juror’s choices (are they picking the BEST book or the book they think is the best FOR us?). It was a travesty last year that The Orenda was not on the short list and I was very surprised this year when Sweetland never even made the longlist. I believe the Governor General’s award now is making the the better choices of short-listed books (and ultimate winners). Thanks for this Shadow Giller discussion, ‘tho – I enjoy reading it.

    Like

    • KevinfromCanada Says:

      The Shadow Jury obviously agreed with you last year — we “called in” The Orenda and it was our unanimous choice as the winner.

      I too would have included Sweetland on the longlist this year, although it would not have been my winner. From my perspective, both Us Conductors and Tell were better books.

      While I follow prizes, I am the first to say they are “subjective” events — juries develop their own personalities and priorities and that gets reflected in the results. Certainly, one of the reasons that we conduct the Shadow Giller is to try to provide some thoughts on books that might well get overlooked — something that I think is true of this year’s choice.

      Like

  3. Lisa Hill Says:

    Well done to all of you, I know how much work these shadow juries are and you have done a great job as usual.
    LOL I’ll buy my copy of Us Conductors when I’ve *blush* read The Orenda, I can’t believe I haven’t read it yet …

    Like

    • KevinfromCanada Says:

      You don’t have to *blush* — I have a whole shelf full of Australian books that I have not got to yet.

      This year was more of a challenge than most, for me at least. There seemed to be quite a few books that had a lot of potential, but simply didn’t reach it. I’ll admit that is why I am running behind on reviews because those are the ones that I find it hardest to write about.

      Like

  4. Kerry Says:

    Your point about personal prejudices is apt for me. Based on your reviews, I am going to opt for Itani. It sounds like a quieter book and not a debut. I have a slight prejudice against debut novels, or debut authors really, in that I think youth is sometimes prioritized in publishing. First books are only rarely masterpieces and only slightly more often the author’s best work. Fiction writing is something that lends itself to practice and experience. I root for improving mid-listers over young sensations. But only when other criteria have produced a near draw.

    Like

    • KevinfromCanada Says:

      I can hardly argue with your choice since I placed Itani first on both ballots. If you go back to my review of Us Conductors (here), you’ll see that you and I do part ways when it comes to debut authors. This one comes from Random House Canada’s New Face of Fiction program and I have had very good experiences over the years with it — Ann-Marie Macdonald, Timothy Taylor and Alexi Zentner are just three authors I first came to there.

      I have to agree with the need for “rooting for mid-listers”, however. As the economic world gets tighter for book publishing, that seems to be the group that is paying the highest price.

      Like

  5. roughghosts Says:

    Hooray to the shadow jury. You nailed it! And congratulations to Sean for his win tonight. I ran in to him many times over the recent Wordfest event here where he was involved in a number of presentations. I have yet to read it but will add it to the list now!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: