The Squabble, by Nikolai Gogol


Purchased from

Translated by Hugh Aplin

So before someone asks in a comment: “Have you read Dead Souls?” — the answer is “no, I haven’t, but I intend to”. On the other hand, while perusing the Hesperus Press site recently, I came across a version of Nikolai Gogol’s The Squabble and swallowed the baited hook immediately — I’d heard about the novella before and a growing affection for Hesperus volumes supplied the rest of the motivation.

Even for those of us who like nineteenth century Russian writing, Gogol is a bit of an enigma. He died young at 43 and his work pretty much comes down to three sets: the aforementioned Dead Souls (intended to be volume one of a trilogy), the Petersburg tales (including his best known work, “The Greatcoat”) and the Mirgorod (four stories, three of which are included in this volume), which develop the theme of a Little Russian town, in the Ukraine. And before anyone points out that Gogol is Ukrainian, not Russian, I do know that.

The Squabble is a wonderful novella; for this reader, a prototype for the genre. For those readers who have been entranced by “The Greatcoat” (that would include KfC), this is a story that confirms Gogol’s ability to turn the particular into the universal, in both an engaging and significant fashion. Two aging, and increasingly reclusive, neighbors — Ivan Ivanovich and Ivan Nikiforovich — have for years visited and conversed with each other. Indeed, their interaction with each other is pretty much their interaction with the rest of the world. Here is how Gogol introduces Ivan Ivanovich:

Ivan Ivanovich has a glorious coat! Quite excellent! And what lambskins! They’re grey-blue with a touch of frost! God knows how much I’d bet that nobody can be found with any like them! Just look at them, for God’s sake, especially if he starts talking to someone, look at them from the side; what a feast for the eye. Indescribable: velvet! silver! fire!

All those exclamation marks would seem to presage a story of action — not so. Rather, an introduction to the concept that in a world where not much happens, a minor dispute can turn into a lifelong pursuit. Ivan Ivanovich visits his good friend and neighbor, Ivan Nikiforovich, and, absent anything else to talk about, they fall into the exchange that will become the centrepiece of “the squabble”. Ivan N’s servant has been airing out his old military garments, including his old gun (even Gogol wonders about the propriety of “airing out” a gun, but he needs the conceit for the plot). Ivan I wants the gun and heads off for a visit, offering a pig and two sacks of oats as a barter in exchange for the weapon. Ivan N doesn’t take to the proposal:

“What’s that! Two sacks of oats and a pig for the gun?”
“Well, isn’t that enough?”
“For the gun?”
“Of course it’s for the gun.”
“Two sacks for the gun?”
“Not two empty sacks, but sacks of oats; and have you forgotten the pig?”
“You can go and kiss your pig, or if you prefer it, then the Devil!”
“Oh, you’re so touchy! You’ll see in the other world you’ll have your tongue studded with hot needles for such blasphemous words. After a conversation with you, people need to wash their hands and face, and fumigate themselves.”
“Allow me, Ivan Ivanovitch. A gun is a noble thing, the most curious amusement, and, what’s more, a nice decoration in the room…”
“You, Ivan Nikiforovich, are fussing over your gun like a bear with a sore head,” said Ivan Ivanovich in annoyance, because he was truly beginning to get angry now.
“And your, Ivan Ivanovich, are a real goose.”

That is about as quick a summary of pointless conflict escalation as you could ever ask for — and it is that last statement, with its reference to being “a goose”, that sets off the Jarndyce vs Jarndyce conflict that dominates the rest of the novella. Both Ivans swear complaints; while all of Mirgorod (which translates as “Worldtown”, according to translator Hugh Alpin) want the conflict to end and the friends to be reconciled, they foolishly decide instead to pursue the squabble in the courts, where it languishes without decision (“it will come tomorrow”) for more than a decade. You can start to imagine the consequences — Dickens would certainly have no problem on that count. If you don’t already know the outlines of the story, the pig does play a major part and real geese (well, at least a goose coop) play a major factor.

The Squabble has much to recommend it. A pointless dispute escalates, bureaucracy takes over (Patrick McCabe in his introduction to this volume makes reference to both Franz Kafka and Monty Python as comparisons and both are valid) and disaster, of a sort, ensues. For this reader, the work fits a definition of the “perfect” novella: You spend much more time thinking about it after reading it, than you spent in the reading. That for me is the ideal definition of the genre.

This Hesperus volume contains two other stories from the Mirgorod series: Olde-Worlde Landowners and The Carriage. The first is Gogol’s version of the Philemon and Baucis myth, an extremely old couple who when offered a reward by Zeus ask only to be allowed to die at the same time — it is a very charming story. The Carriage is slight but worthwhile — an examination of how ego and the desire to move above your station sometimes provide a disastrous result.

I think most avid readers would agree that there are days when you would like to pick up a volume, knowing that in only a few hours (this book is about a two hour venture the first time through, but you want to read it more than once) you will have finished it and be able to put it down, saying “that was more than worthwhile”. And many days later, you are still thinking about that experience.

The Squabble perfectly fits that description. I’m not sure when I’ll get to Dead Souls but this diversion ensures that I eventually will.

15 Responses to “The Squabble, by Nikolai Gogol”

  1. Lisa Hill Says:

    Thanks for alerting me to this, Kevin…I too have ‘always meant to’ read Gogol, and this looks like a good start.
    Lisa (ANZ LitLovers)


  2. KevinfromCanada Says:

    Lisa: It is. I put it down after finishing it and spent most of the next two days contemplating possibilities. An excellent piece of work.


  3. Rob Says:

    This sounds like a great volume. It’s unfortunate that they’ve included (if I follow you) three out of four of the Mirgorod stories, though, as presumably this means that eventually one would end up buying another edition to get all four.

    Incidentally, do you know something I don’t about the Hesperus site? (Quite probable.) I’ve not been able to access it for a year.


  4. ER, Hesperus Press Says:

    Hello, it’s Ellie from Hesperus here. The site is being redesigned and will be up imminently! So glad you enjoyed this one — it’s a favourite of mine, too.


  5. KevinfromCanada Says:

    Rob: It is an excellent novella. While I am anything but a Gogol scholar, my impression is that the classification of Mirgorod stories is post-Gogol convenience rather than authorial intention. The fourth story not in his collection is Viy, described by the translator here as a “spurious folk legend” (whatever that might be). And apparently one might also want to include the epic poem Taras Bulba. So I’m quite happy to have the three story volume.

    And you caught me out on the Hesperus website matter — it’s been “under construction” for as many months as I can remember. I used an advanced search function at either Indigo-Chapters or the Book Depository, plugging in Hesperus Press as publisher.


  6. KevinfromCanada Says:

    Ellie: Whoops — I replied to Rob before I realized your comment was in the queue. Thanks for the information — when the site is up, please come back and leave a link. As you can probably tell, I am a major fan of Hesperus work (and will be shopping the site once it is up) — I love the way you find overlooked works from major writers and bring them back into circulation. So far I’ve reviewed Henry James, Edith Wharton, Theophile Gautier and Gogol — still have an Andre Malraux on hand. Every one that I have read so far has been a significant success, so thanks for your excellent choices.


  7. Trevor Says:

    I’m not sure if it was Ellie who helped me (I’m pretty sure it was), but I requested a Hesperus catalog a few months ago and was astounded by the number and quality of books and authors they offer. Lots of lesser known works by masters. I recommend requesting one, even before they get the website up and running. Now . . . I still need to get some.


  8. KevinfromCanada Says:

    I agree, Trevor. I searched both the Chapters and Book Depository sites (wanted to know which ones I might have to buy overseas) and was amazed not just by the number of titles, but how many I wanted. I haven’t even really started on what’s available in Canada. And I would also like to tout their ability to fiind excellent authors for introductions (Patrick McCabe for this one, Gilbert Adair for The Jinx, e.g.).


  9. Maggie Says:

    Thanks for this review. This whole series sounds fantastic!


  10. KevinfromCanada Says:

    Hesperus is a publisher well-worth looking at. Not only is the content first-rate, the physical volumes are very impressive.


  11. Rob Says:

    I second (third?) (fourth?) Kevin’s comments about Hesperus. I’ve got a stack of terrific titles published by them in those lovely handy little editions.


  12. Kerry Says:

    I am onboard with those who keep meaning to get to Gogol. You have me coveting this particular book. It sounds like a great story and a great introduction to his work. You have made a more than ample case for Hesperus Press generally, too. Sounds like I could live happily for a few years reading only Hesperus books….I am almost afraid to check them out, but I will.


  13. KevinfromCanada Says:

    Kerry: “I am almost afraid…..” A well-placed fear, particularly for those of us who want handy introductions to authors we haven’t read (e.g. Gogol or Gautier) or less well-known work from authors we know (James and Wharton — all four mentioned have been reviewed here in the last few months). I’m going to try to be a mature person and ration myself to one ever month or two.


  14. Max Cairnduff Says:

    That sounds simply brilliant. A lovely bit of translation too, assuming it’s accurate (which I’m sure it is), very lively.

    I shall definitely be picking this up, marvellous.


  15. Guy Savage Says:

    I absolutely loved Dead Souls. I was completely unprepared for how funny it was.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: