<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sweet Tooth, by Ian McEwan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/2012/08/29/sweet-tooth-by-ian-mcewan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/2012/08/29/sweet-tooth-by-ian-mcewan/</link>
	<description>This blogger seems to like every Australian writer but me -- P. Carey</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:39:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/2012/08/29/sweet-tooth-by-ian-mcewan/#comment-12602</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 19:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/?p=6713#comment-12602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oliver,

So sorry to hear that you gave up on The Child in Time. I am big admirer of McEwan&#039;s work and think TCiT is one of his most cohesive novels - both theme and plot really balance each other, in my opinion. Give it another go.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oliver,</p>
<p>So sorry to hear that you gave up on The Child in Time. I am big admirer of McEwan&#8217;s work and think TCiT is one of his most cohesive novels &#8211; both theme and plot really balance each other, in my opinion. Give it another go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KevinfromCanada</title>
		<link>http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/2012/08/29/sweet-tooth-by-ian-mcewan/#comment-12592</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KevinfromCanada]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/?p=6713#comment-12592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oliver:  First, thanks for the kind words -- I hope you keep returning to the blog.

Your take on &lt;em&gt;Sweet Tooth&lt;/em&gt; is interesting because you do bring a fresh eye to the author.  My problem was that I found the novel lazy and self-indulgent, but then I have had a lot of exposure to his previous works.  I do agree that this is not a spy novel, although for my money it would have been a better read if it was.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oliver:  First, thanks for the kind words &#8212; I hope you keep returning to the blog.</p>
<p>Your take on <em>Sweet Tooth</em> is interesting because you do bring a fresh eye to the author.  My problem was that I found the novel lazy and self-indulgent, but then I have had a lot of exposure to his previous works.  I do agree that this is not a spy novel, although for my money it would have been a better read if it was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver from Alberta</title>
		<link>http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/2012/08/29/sweet-tooth-by-ian-mcewan/#comment-12588</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oliver from Alberta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 00:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/?p=6713#comment-12588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to confess that I&#039;m new to McEwan. This is a big gap in my novel-reading, certainly; however, a long time ago I tried to read A Child in Time, didn&#039;t like it, and never went back to McEwan. For some reason, I decided to give Sweet Tooth a try, and I totally loved it. The reviews have been too harsh, in my view. So many of them express disappointment that the book is not a good spy novel -- &quot;not enough Le Carre&quot;, or whatever. The fact of the matter is that Sweet Tooth is not a spy novel. The storyline is set in a spy environment, but that is not what the novel is about. It is about novel-writing and the implied bond between the author and the reader. I found the novel to be sweet, smart, memorable, and exquisitely crafted. If it is a &quot;weaker&quot; novel in McEwan&#039;s body of work, than am I ever in for a treat when I go back to read his other work!
P.S.: Kevin, I just discovered your website and think it&#039;s great! When it came up in my Google search for Sweet Tooth reviews, I was thinking it was going to be some simplistic fan site. But it&#039;s much more than that. Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to confess that I&#8217;m new to McEwan. This is a big gap in my novel-reading, certainly; however, a long time ago I tried to read A Child in Time, didn&#8217;t like it, and never went back to McEwan. For some reason, I decided to give Sweet Tooth a try, and I totally loved it. The reviews have been too harsh, in my view. So many of them express disappointment that the book is not a good spy novel &#8212; &#8220;not enough Le Carre&#8221;, or whatever. The fact of the matter is that Sweet Tooth is not a spy novel. The storyline is set in a spy environment, but that is not what the novel is about. It is about novel-writing and the implied bond between the author and the reader. I found the novel to be sweet, smart, memorable, and exquisitely crafted. If it is a &#8220;weaker&#8221; novel in McEwan&#8217;s body of work, than am I ever in for a treat when I go back to read his other work!<br />
P.S.: Kevin, I just discovered your website and think it&#8217;s great! When it came up in my Google search for Sweet Tooth reviews, I was thinking it was going to be some simplistic fan site. But it&#8217;s much more than that. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KevinfromCanada</title>
		<link>http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/2012/08/29/sweet-tooth-by-ian-mcewan/#comment-12539</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KevinfromCanada]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 02:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/?p=6713#comment-12539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hoping that their books will be carried by Asda, a UK supermarket -- kind of like getting placed by the tills at Walmart in North America.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoping that their books will be carried by Asda, a UK supermarket &#8212; kind of like getting placed by the tills at Walmart in North America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/2012/08/29/sweet-tooth-by-ian-mcewan/#comment-12538</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrea]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 02:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/?p=6713#comment-12538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What does &quot;troubling the Asda tills&quot; mean?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does &#8220;troubling the Asda tills&#8221; mean?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Monks</title>
		<link>http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/2012/08/29/sweet-tooth-by-ian-mcewan/#comment-12317</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee Monks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 17:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/?p=6713#comment-12317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree. And the Amis I heard on the NY Times books podcast was as sharp as ever but exceedingly likeable also. Strange but welcome.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. And the Amis I heard on the NY Times books podcast was as sharp as ever but exceedingly likeable also. Strange but welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KevinfromCanada</title>
		<link>http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/2012/08/29/sweet-tooth-by-ian-mcewan/#comment-12301</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KevinfromCanada]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/?p=6713#comment-12301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the lure of &quot;personality&quot; with all its lucrative accoutrements may be the current day version of Faust&#039;s bargain.  Perhaps Dorian Gray is an even better example -- television and conventional media reflect back to McEwan what he thinks he still looks like; the rest of us who read the books are seeing something quite different.

There is a temptation to think the process is irreversible although Martin Amis is giving me cause to wonder.  I do think &lt;a href=&#039;http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/2012/07/23/lionel-asbo-by-martin-amis/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Lionel Asbo&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ranks with his best novels.  And the death of Hitchens and Amis&#039; move to New York seems to have led to a less annoying public persona.  Perhaps it might just be a temporary remission, but the Amis we are seeing this summer seems to be much closer to the guy I admired and appreciated decades ago.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the lure of &#8220;personality&#8221; with all its lucrative accoutrements may be the current day version of Faust&#8217;s bargain.  Perhaps Dorian Gray is an even better example &#8212; television and conventional media reflect back to McEwan what he thinks he still looks like; the rest of us who read the books are seeing something quite different.</p>
<p>There is a temptation to think the process is irreversible although Martin Amis is giving me cause to wonder.  I do think <a href='http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/2012/07/23/lionel-asbo-by-martin-amis/' rel="nofollow"><em>Lionel Asbo</em></a> ranks with his best novels.  And the death of Hitchens and Amis&#8217; move to New York seems to have led to a less annoying public persona.  Perhaps it might just be a temporary remission, but the Amis we are seeing this summer seems to be much closer to the guy I admired and appreciated decades ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Monks</title>
		<link>http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/2012/08/29/sweet-tooth-by-ian-mcewan/#comment-12300</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee Monks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/?p=6713#comment-12300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think Solar has bursts of brilliance that are tantalising reminders of the McEwan of Atonement and the early stories. As you say, he never maintains that, and is now a &#039;personality&#039; never having any need to move out of first gear. He&#039;s marking time and shifting units like so many.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Solar has bursts of brilliance that are tantalising reminders of the McEwan of Atonement and the early stories. As you say, he never maintains that, and is now a &#8216;personality&#8217; never having any need to move out of first gear. He&#8217;s marking time and shifting units like so many.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KevinfromCanada</title>
		<link>http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/2012/08/29/sweet-tooth-by-ian-mcewan/#comment-12271</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KevinfromCanada]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 14:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/?p=6713#comment-12271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mary, Lee, Max:  Mary&#039;s summary of the situation is concise and correct.  What originally attracted me to McEwan (my first exposure was &lt;em&gt;The Innocents&lt;/em&gt;) was that 95 per cent of the world he was writing about was perfectly normal -- and the other 5 per cent was  completely impossible.  His descriptive writing made the realist world convincing, interesting and entertaining; his ability to hold the tension between normal and absurd made his plots and characters unlike any author.

He still has the writing ability to produce moments that are exceptional -- &lt;em&gt;Solar&lt;/em&gt; had some laugh-out-loud set pieces, this one captures descriptions of English urban landscape and class/gender tensions that are superb.  Alas with the lazy/self-indulgent story line (I&#039;d lean more to self-indulgent, but it could be either), the good bits only serve as a painful indication of what might have been accomplished.

One of the reasons that I like books more than authors is that when the author becomes a media &quot;star&quot; (McEwan, Amis, Byatt, Atwood, Irving and, the ultimate, Rushdie), he or she spends more time and effort working on that personality than on the craft that got them there in the first place -- perhaps they are so talented that publisher-acceptable writing is just too easy.  Now that I&#039;ve checked some of the reviews in the mainstream media of this novel, I&#039;d say that McEwan has really gone overboard on the &quot;cute references to myself&quot; aspects in this book -- I&#039;d have been even more annoyed with it if I had recognized them in the first place.

And despite all that, I will buy the next book.  It is apparent that all the talent is still there -- it just doesn&#039;t seem to be being applied as thoroughly and consistently as it once was.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mary, Lee, Max:  Mary&#8217;s summary of the situation is concise and correct.  What originally attracted me to McEwan (my first exposure was <em>The Innocents</em>) was that 95 per cent of the world he was writing about was perfectly normal &#8212; and the other 5 per cent was  completely impossible.  His descriptive writing made the realist world convincing, interesting and entertaining; his ability to hold the tension between normal and absurd made his plots and characters unlike any author.</p>
<p>He still has the writing ability to produce moments that are exceptional &#8212; <em>Solar</em> had some laugh-out-loud set pieces, this one captures descriptions of English urban landscape and class/gender tensions that are superb.  Alas with the lazy/self-indulgent story line (I&#8217;d lean more to self-indulgent, but it could be either), the good bits only serve as a painful indication of what might have been accomplished.</p>
<p>One of the reasons that I like books more than authors is that when the author becomes a media &#8220;star&#8221; (McEwan, Amis, Byatt, Atwood, Irving and, the ultimate, Rushdie), he or she spends more time and effort working on that personality than on the craft that got them there in the first place &#8212; perhaps they are so talented that publisher-acceptable writing is just too easy.  Now that I&#8217;ve checked some of the reviews in the mainstream media of this novel, I&#8217;d say that McEwan has really gone overboard on the &#8220;cute references to myself&#8221; aspects in this book &#8212; I&#8217;d have been even more annoyed with it if I had recognized them in the first place.</p>
<p>And despite all that, I will buy the next book.  It is apparent that all the talent is still there &#8212; it just doesn&#8217;t seem to be being applied as thoroughly and consistently as it once was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Monks</title>
		<link>http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/2012/08/29/sweet-tooth-by-ian-mcewan/#comment-12264</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee Monks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 12:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/?p=6713#comment-12264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ariel S Winter is showing off a wee bit with his latest...do check that out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ariel S Winter is showing off a wee bit with his latest&#8230;do check that out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
