<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Capital, by John Lanchester</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/2012/04/04/capital-by-john-lanchester/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/2012/04/04/capital-by-john-lanchester/</link>
	<description>This blogger seems to like every Australian writer but me -- P. Carey</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 02:51:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: KevinfromCanada</title>
		<link>http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/2012/04/04/capital-by-john-lanchester/#comment-10854</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KevinfromCanada]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 20:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/?p=6380#comment-10854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Craig:  While I usually find multi-character, multi-stream narratives share a weakness (that some of the characters just are not interesting enough), Lanchester avoids that stumble here.  I think the novel is worth its lengh -- the bits that slowed somewhat for me were when he seemed to want to pay more attentnion to signifigance than character.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig:  While I usually find multi-character, multi-stream narratives share a weakness (that some of the characters just are not interesting enough), Lanchester avoids that stumble here.  I think the novel is worth its lengh &#8212; the bits that slowed somewhat for me were when he seemed to want to pay more attentnion to signifigance than character.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig D.</title>
		<link>http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/2012/04/04/capital-by-john-lanchester/#comment-10853</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig D.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 18:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/?p=6380#comment-10853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love the cover art. Looks like a Shel Silverstein drawing, and it nicely suggests the idea of cities being worlds unto themselves.

I&#039;m always leery of these &quot;widescreen&quot; novels with so many characters and subplots going on at once. It&#039;s hard enough to pull off in less than 300 pages, but novels are already so self-indulgent these days (seriously, what the hell ever happened to editors?) that anything longer than 400 is already struggling to convince me to bother with it.

Philip K. Dick pulls off the widescreen novel beautifully in about 250 pages with &quot;Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?&quot; It&#039;s a shining example that authors setting out to do the same thing should be required by law to read beforehand.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the cover art. Looks like a Shel Silverstein drawing, and it nicely suggests the idea of cities being worlds unto themselves.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m always leery of these &#8220;widescreen&#8221; novels with so many characters and subplots going on at once. It&#8217;s hard enough to pull off in less than 300 pages, but novels are already so self-indulgent these days (seriously, what the hell ever happened to editors?) that anything longer than 400 is already struggling to convince me to bother with it.</p>
<p>Philip K. Dick pulls off the widescreen novel beautifully in about 250 pages with &#8220;Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?&#8221; It&#8217;s a shining example that authors setting out to do the same thing should be required by law to read beforehand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KevinfromCanada</title>
		<link>http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/2012/04/04/capital-by-john-lanchester/#comment-10821</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KevinfromCanada]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/?p=6380#comment-10821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Max:  I think it is just too bulky (and perhaps structurally slight) to serve as a commute read.  You know London much better than I do but I did appreciate the way that Lanchester contrasted the City and his chosen street.  In the final analysis, though, that was good background -- the best parts of the book were his oddball characters, all of whom I came to quite like.  That is why I also think it makes for a very good holiday read -- on a purely practical note, the chapters are quite short so it can be put down when other tasks beckon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Max:  I think it is just too bulky (and perhaps structurally slight) to serve as a commute read.  You know London much better than I do but I did appreciate the way that Lanchester contrasted the City and his chosen street.  In the final analysis, though, that was good background &#8212; the best parts of the book were his oddball characters, all of whom I came to quite like.  That is why I also think it makes for a very good holiday read &#8212; on a purely practical note, the chapters are quite short so it can be put down when other tasks beckon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Cairnduff</title>
		<link>http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/2012/04/04/capital-by-john-lanchester/#comment-10819</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max Cairnduff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/?p=6380#comment-10819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The tip on how to read it is useful. I can see it might make a better holiday read and coud fare terribly as a commute read.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tip on how to read it is useful. I can see it might make a better holiday read and coud fare terribly as a commute read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kimbofo</title>
		<link>http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/2012/04/04/capital-by-john-lanchester/#comment-10770</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kimbofo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 10:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/?p=6380#comment-10770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh yes, Guy, you *must* read this one. Honestly, the narrator here is worse than Matt! I laughed a lot while reading this one and read passages out loud to my Other Half because I just had to share the hilarity and absurdity with someone else. I&#039;ve just reviewed it on the blog if you want to take a look.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes, Guy, you *must* read this one. Honestly, the narrator here is worse than Matt! I laughed a lot while reading this one and read passages out loud to my Other Half because I just had to share the hilarity and absurdity with someone else. I&#8217;ve just reviewed it on the blog if you want to take a look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KevinfromCanada</title>
		<link>http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/2012/04/04/capital-by-john-lanchester/#comment-10755</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KevinfromCanada]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/?p=6380#comment-10755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leroy:  We were up at Lake Louise for three days this week and Mrs. KfC whizzed through &lt;em&gt;Capital&lt;/em&gt; with an evening to spare -- and she did not feel that it sagged in the middle.  I suspect that that kind of &quot;holiday&quot; reading might be the best environment for the novel -- the characters and their stories probably have more focus to them when there are not a lot of distractions around.  As for &quot;type&quot;, I&#039;d say the Franzen comparison is probably a fair one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leroy:  We were up at Lake Louise for three days this week and Mrs. KfC whizzed through <em>Capital</em> with an evening to spare &#8212; and she did not feel that it sagged in the middle.  I suspect that that kind of &#8220;holiday&#8221; reading might be the best environment for the novel &#8212; the characters and their stories probably have more focus to them when there are not a lot of distractions around.  As for &#8220;type&#8221;, I&#8217;d say the Franzen comparison is probably a fair one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leroyhunter</title>
		<link>http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/2012/04/04/capital-by-john-lanchester/#comment-10753</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[leroyhunter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/?p=6380#comment-10753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve read 2 by Lanchester, Whoops! and The Debt to Pleasure, each of which in different ways I thought were excellent. But I think almost since I got a first inkling of this book, specifically the scope / breadth that Max refers to, I decided it wasn&#039;t for me. Much like Franzen, who I repsect as a writer, and whose shorter work (typically essays) I have enjoyed, I find myself wondering if I want to read quite so *much* of Lanchester. Your highlighting the &quot;sag&quot; in the middle of Capital confirms my reluctance, Kevin. Pith! Acerbity! That&#039;s the stuff to give the troops.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read 2 by Lanchester, Whoops! and The Debt to Pleasure, each of which in different ways I thought were excellent. But I think almost since I got a first inkling of this book, specifically the scope / breadth that Max refers to, I decided it wasn&#8217;t for me. Much like Franzen, who I repsect as a writer, and whose shorter work (typically essays) I have enjoyed, I find myself wondering if I want to read quite so *much* of Lanchester. Your highlighting the &#8220;sag&#8221; in the middle of Capital confirms my reluctance, Kevin. Pith! Acerbity! That&#8217;s the stuff to give the troops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KevinfromCanada</title>
		<link>http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/2012/04/04/capital-by-john-lanchester/#comment-10751</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KevinfromCanada]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/?p=6380#comment-10751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Max:  I do think you will find this worthwhile when you are in the mood -- but agree that the wait is essential.  There are a lot of characters, which does mean a lot of stories, but Lanchester does deliver (or did for me) on virtually all of them.  I don&#039;t think the novel adds a lot to my insight of contemporary London, but it did do a very good job of portraying some of the kinds of people who make it tick.  A couple of weeks on I do find that the good parts are growing in memory, which is always a good sign.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Max:  I do think you will find this worthwhile when you are in the mood &#8212; but agree that the wait is essential.  There are a lot of characters, which does mean a lot of stories, but Lanchester does deliver (or did for me) on virtually all of them.  I don&#8217;t think the novel adds a lot to my insight of contemporary London, but it did do a very good job of portraying some of the kinds of people who make it tick.  A couple of weeks on I do find that the good parts are growing in memory, which is always a good sign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy Savage</title>
		<link>http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/2012/04/04/capital-by-john-lanchester/#comment-10747</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guy Savage]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 20:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/?p=6380#comment-10747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just bought a copy, Max.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just bought a copy, Max.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Cairnduff</title>
		<link>http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/2012/04/04/capital-by-john-lanchester/#comment-10743</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max Cairnduff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinfromcanada.wordpress.com/?p=6380#comment-10743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dirty Tricks is quite fun. I think you&#039;d like it Guy.

That diversion aside, I&#039;ve read Lanchester&#039;s LRB articles and he&#039;s one of the very few writers I&#039;ve encountered who actually get it from my perspective. He understands the City, which few writers do (I should read Alex Preston in that light, as an ex-trader gone the literary rather than thriller route I have high hopes, plus I&#039;ve met him and he&#039;s a nice chap).

At about halfway through the review I found myself getting slightly fatigued, and that&#039;s not a criticism, because I read it as telling me something about the book. Some books have so much going on one can&#039;t help but write a lot, but in doing so one reveals what may be an issue with the book (and here is) - that there&#039;s just too much going on.

Widescreen necessarily tends to imply breadth over depth, but there does come a point of diminishing returns. This goes on the firm maybe pile for me. It&#039;s Lanchester and he knows his stuff, I quite enjoy this sort of novel and I am a Londoner, but being right now stuck in a novel that&#039;s longer and has more elements than I absolutely care for I&#039;m a little gunshy. Teju Cole is calling, and I finally succumbed and bought A Sense of an Ending which I&#039;m hoping will be an effective palate cleanser once I finish my current ill-judged sf novel (ill-judged because it was the wrong time to read it, not through inherent fault of its own).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dirty Tricks is quite fun. I think you&#8217;d like it Guy.</p>
<p>That diversion aside, I&#8217;ve read Lanchester&#8217;s LRB articles and he&#8217;s one of the very few writers I&#8217;ve encountered who actually get it from my perspective. He understands the City, which few writers do (I should read Alex Preston in that light, as an ex-trader gone the literary rather than thriller route I have high hopes, plus I&#8217;ve met him and he&#8217;s a nice chap).</p>
<p>At about halfway through the review I found myself getting slightly fatigued, and that&#8217;s not a criticism, because I read it as telling me something about the book. Some books have so much going on one can&#8217;t help but write a lot, but in doing so one reveals what may be an issue with the book (and here is) &#8211; that there&#8217;s just too much going on.</p>
<p>Widescreen necessarily tends to imply breadth over depth, but there does come a point of diminishing returns. This goes on the firm maybe pile for me. It&#8217;s Lanchester and he knows his stuff, I quite enjoy this sort of novel and I am a Londoner, but being right now stuck in a novel that&#8217;s longer and has more elements than I absolutely care for I&#8217;m a little gunshy. Teju Cole is calling, and I finally succumbed and bought A Sense of an Ending which I&#8217;m hoping will be an effective palate cleanser once I finish my current ill-judged sf novel (ill-judged because it was the wrong time to read it, not through inherent fault of its own).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
